🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive policy to prohibit social networking access for young people below 16 is creating waves internationally. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and guardians are observing intently to see if this strategy will set a precedent for other nations.

Across Europe Movement

Across Europe, a rising number of countries are considering similar bans.

• The Danish government plans a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the leader declaring that smartphones and platforms are "robbing our children's childhood". A law could be formalized soon.
• Norway is set to implement a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to protect children from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to authenticate the user details of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an similar ban remains "one of the options on the table".
• In Spain, the president has urged parliament to pass a law raising the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has suggested a similar move, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged parents to restrict their children from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has approved a advisory statement calling for a ban for under-16s except if a parent decides otherwise is provided. Although it cautions of the "habit-forming" nature of these platforms, the move does not enact binding law.

"An effective age limit is a solid starting point," commented a leading MEP behind the measure.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Approach

In the UK, the leadership has kept open a future ban, stating that "no option is discarded" but stressing any action must be "based on conclusive evidence".

Earlier, support built behind a proposal to introduce limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end watered down. Nonetheless, the administration vowed to investigate the issue.

Advocacy groups have raised apprehensions. An organization founded by the relatives of a girl who took her own life after encountering dangerous platform posts contends that a simple age ban may not make platforms safer and could result in a "dangerous transition" of exposure when young people turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design tools that are safe and age appropriate for young users," commented a prominent peer.

The US: A Fragmented Picture

Across America, legislation is largely happening at the regional level against a backdrop of country-wide inaction.

• Utah requires parental consent for minors to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has signed a bill banning children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a rule limiting minors to one hour of social media time per day, with any further access requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted bills demanding parental consent for under-16s to set up social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and proposals from certain politicians to copy this example, a nationwide ban is right now seen as improbable.

International Views

Apart from the West, additional nations are likewise taking action.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for teenagers effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, global organizations take a more measured stance. The UN children's agency has warned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "might prove counterproductive". The agency notes that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable youth and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize safety.

Even as this international debate continues, the actions of Australia and several other countries demonstrate that states globally are increasingly content to wait for platforms to make changes on their own.